Godzilla vs. Kong ★★★ ½ ☆ | Movie Review

Synopsis


The epic next chapter in the cinematic Monsterverse pits two of the greatest icons in motion picture history against one another - the fearsome Godzilla and the mighty Kong - with humanity caught in the balance.

Directed by Adam Wingard.
Written by Terry Rossio, Michael Dougherty and Zach Shields.
Starring Rebecca Hall, Alexander Skarsgård, Brian Tyree Henry, Millie Bobby Brown, Kyle Chandler and Julian Dennison.
Released available on VOD... and hopefully in cinemas


Review


Monsters! Yay! Small screen... booooooo!

Godzilla and Kong come head to head in a vicious battle as the humans embark on a mission to discover the ultimate power source.

I won't harp on this point too much because we're nearly at the point where I won't have to... hopefully... but this needs the big screen. You need that experience to get the full effect.

Monsters fight... do we need any story? I didn't. Which is just as well because I wouldn't be able to tell you what specifically happened apart from what I wrote in the synopsis.

You could have had this film without the humans, or as a human focus film with the monsters just lurking in the background of the whole thing. (Though I don't think anyone would care about the latter.)  The monsters could easily have done a film without the humans, there's only actually one point where they're needed, and that was quite frankly dubious.

Let's talk about those humans, but where to start? The film needed to commit to either being a companion to the last film or being a new film in the franchise. So far all the others have been quite independent of each other in comparison. It may not be a popular opinion, but I would have opted for a new film... and that means no Millie Bobby Brown and no Kyle Chandler (who was quite frankly underused anyway).

My definite highlight was Brian Tyree Henry in his role as the conspiracy podcaster, and I really enjoyed that whole thread. But it definitely could have been switched up a bit and resulted in a much more believable discovery sequence in the plot. That was quite a big thing in the film, when giant monster events are more believable than human ones, you need to rethink what you're doing.

As much as I love Alexander Skarsgård, I cannot tell you much of anything about his role. He's usually always an enjoyable actor, but even that couldn't save this bland character. So much so, that when I listened to a podcast on this film and they mentioned him, I went "oh yeah, he was in it".

My main take away was that most characters had very little development, and I know I was there for the monsters, but the humans needed to not be throwaways for the amount of time they spent on screen.

I'm not going to go into the effects, they were great, and I loved them just as much as in King of the Monsters. The colours were amazing.

I'm very pleased I didn't spot spoilers for the film before seeing it. The reveals were well done and I enjoyed some of the moments that came from them, but it leads me to something I've been pondering...

This sequence of films feels wrong, Had Godzilla vs. Kong been before King of the Monsters then you'd have been presented with the perfect way to introduce more creatures, but the character dynamics would not have been right with that shuffle. There are so many possibilities, that going over them would take way too long.

For a title that highlights Godzilla before Kong, it's oddly weighted, Kong is a much bigger feature than G-zee is. He gets his own personality and a bit more heart, and it was nice to see him become a new person... ape... giant fuzzball. I can't help but be a little sad that one of his moments from the original wasn't duplicated in all its glory here.

Overall it's a fun creature feature and the action is epic as expected, with some twists thrown in if you managed to avoid the spoilers. While I really do love moments from Godzilla vs. Kong, I'm not sure it's better than KotM, but it's well worth the watch either way.

What you should do


If the price was to buy the blu-ray rather than to rent, I absolutely would have brought it. I find these films very entertaining to rewatch and that makes the price worthwhile. But at £16 I would avoid paying that to watch at home as a one-off cost unless you're seeing it in a cinema. It's definitely worth watching at some point though.

Movie thing you wish you could take home


I'd tell you but it would constitute spoilers.

Comments